- From: =JeffH via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 01:28:48 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
Does this last paragraph of the current section 5
{#extension-request-parameters} address this use case?
```
For extensions that specify additional authenticator processing only,
it is desirable that the platform need not know the extension. To
support this, platforms SHOULD pass the client argument of unknown
extension as the authenticator argument unchanged, under the same
extension identifier. The authenticator argument should be the CBOR
encoding of the client argument, as specified in Section 4.2 of
[RFC7049]. Clients SHOULD silently drop unknown extensions whose
client argument cannot be encoded as a CBOR structure.
```
--
GitHub Notification of comment by equalsJeffH
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/98#issuecomment-221449654 using
your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 01:28:49 UTC