Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Thursday, 31 May 2012
- Re: Proper format for date in BlogPosting
- Re: setting multiple properties: name and location in a href?
- Re: Schema for legal judgements?
- Re: Schema for legal judgements?
- setting multiple properties: name and location in a href?
- Re: Schema for legal judgements?
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Thursday, 31 May 2012
Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Tuesday, 29 May 2012
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- image optimization according to schema.org
- using <html> tag
Monday, 28 May 2012
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
Thursday, 24 May 2012
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- RE: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: Schema for vehicles
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-13 (Describing Real Estate): Schema.org should document how best to describe Real Estate [Feedback on Schema.org]
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
- Re: Schema for vehicles
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- RE: Schema for vehicles
- Re: Schema for vehicles
- Schema for vehicles
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: Extensions for stereoscopic 3D images?
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: Extensions for stereoscopic 3D images?
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
Monday, 21 May 2012
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- Re: Extensions for stereoscopic 3D images?
- schema.org itemtypes for various pages on a blog
- Extensions for stereoscopic 3D images?
- Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org
- OGP/schema.org mappings
- Re: ANN: UMBEL v 1.05
- Re: ANN: UMBEL v 1.05
- ANN: UMBEL v 1.05
Sunday, 20 May 2012
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
Wednesday, 16 May 2012
Friday, 18 May 2012
Thursday, 17 May 2012
- Breadcrumbs proposal
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-16 (Add an Uncertain Date/Time mechanism): ISO8601 doesn't support imprecise dates, useful for cultural heritage, historical data, geneaology [Feedback on Schema.org]
- Re: webschema-ISSUE-16 (Add an Uncertain Date/Time mechanism): ISO8601 doesn't support imprecise dates, useful for cultural heritage, historical data, geneaology [Feedback on Schema.org]
- webschema-ISSUE-16 (Add an Uncertain Date/Time mechanism): ISO8601 doesn't support imprecise dates, useful for cultural heritage, historical data, geneaology [Feedback on Schema.org]
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
- Re: two new issues: schema.org booleans; xsd Time and DateTime
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
Monday, 14 May 2012
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- New proposal: health & medical extensions to schema.org
- Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Re: Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
- Naming Schema properties (Was: On using qualified names for properties)
Saturday, 12 May 2012
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
Friday, 11 May 2012
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- RE: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- RE: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- Why would one use time and datetime for a property with an expected type of date?
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration
- Re: two new issues: schema.org booleans; xsd Time and DateTime
Thursday, 10 May 2012
- RE: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- Re: On using qualified names for properties
- On using qualified names for properties
Tuesday, 8 May 2012
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- Re: Schema.org External Enumerations mechanism
- Re: Property to designate parent entity
Monday, 7 May 2012
Friday, 4 May 2012
Wednesday, 2 May 2012
- Re: Last Call for Comments ... Re: proposal for updates to http://schema.org/Event
- Re: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle
- RE: vocab idea: SatiricalArticle