Re: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for inclusion with Schema.org

I'm excited to see this moving along as well. Two questions:

1. What's the possibility for considering the online course suggestions
Aaron Bradley made? If it's too late to propose new properties (I.e.
Credit), can we at least document as best practice the use of the Event
type for describing start and end dates?

2. Is anything happening with accessibility?

-----------
Peter Pinch
Production Manager, MIT OpenCourseWare
pdpinch@mit.edu
http://ocw.mit.edu




-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Grossmeier <greg@creativecommons.org>
Date: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:19 PM
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Subject: (most likely) Version 1.0 of LRMI specification - proposed for
inclusion with Schema.org
Resent-From: <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:21 PM

>Hello all,
>
>It is my pleasure to share with you what we hope to be the LRMI 1.0
>release.
>
>This specification hopes to address the educational community's use case
>of describing educational content online in a manner that will allow the
>greatest opportunities for all learners (searchers).
>
>You can find the full specification at:
>  http://wiki.creativecommons.org/LRMI/Properties/1.0
>
>The proposal on the w3.org WebSchemas wiki page:
>  http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/LearningResources
>
>Two examples are online on the lrmi.net site:
>* http://lrmi.net/examples/nsdl20110414163807295T.htm
>* http://lrmi.net/examples/Complex_Area_Problems.html
>
>(There will be more added there later, there is a redesign of lrmi.net
>happening right now)
>
>We (the LRMI Technical Working Group) believe we've hit the sweet spot
>with this version, but if you see any quickly fixable bugs, please let
>me/us know!
>
>Best,
>
>Greg
>
>-- 
>Greg Grossmeier
>Education Technology & Policy Coordinator
>twitter: @g_gerg / identi.ca: @greg / skype: greg.grossmeier
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 17:33:24 UTC