- From: Aaron Brown <abbrown@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <qiedeo28gsvobhrik24enhk6.1337031942994@google.com>
Good call, fixed and updated! Thanks Thad. --Aaron On Mon May 14 17:17:56 GMT-400 2012, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > relevantSpecialty MedicalSpecialty<http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/MedicalSpecialty> If > applicable, a medical specialty in which this term is relevant. > > > For the above MedicalEntity<http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/MedicalEntity> , > I would advise replacing "term" with "entity". A potential snafu there. > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Aaron Brown <abbrown@google.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As I’ve alluded to before on this list ( > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Feb/0053.html), > over the past 6 months, a few of us at Google and other institutions have > been working on a set of schema.org extensions to cover the health and > medical domain. After several internal iterations and a lot of feedback > from initial reviewers (including the US NCBI; physicians at Harvard, > Stanford, and Duke; the major search engines; and a few health web sites), > we think we have a solid draft and would like to open it for public > feedback as a step toward incorporating it into schema.org. > > The proposed health/medical schema can be found at > http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/ which includes an introduction > as well as a snapshot of the type hierarchy and several markup examples. > It's also linked on the w3 wiki at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/MedicalHealthProposal. As you'll see > this is a substantial piece of work, so we’d welcome feedback and detailed > review comments on the specifics (please follow up to this email). > > For those interested in more background on the approach: our goal is to > create schema that webmasters and content publishers can use to mark up > health and medical content on the web, with a particular focus on markup > that will help patients, physicians, and generally health-interested > consumers find relevant health information via search. The scope of > coverage for the schema is broad, and is intended to cover both consumer- > and professionally-targeted health and medical web content (of course, any > particular piece of online health/medical content is likely to use only a > subset of the schema). We’ve worked with physicians, consumer web sites, > and government health organizations to get input into the key topics and > properties to model and to refine the schema structure and type/property > documentation. > > Note that it is explicitly not our goal to replace the many very good and > comprehensive medical ontologies, meta-thesaurii, or controlled > vocabularies that have been created over the years; our focus has been > instead on creating complementary, lightweight markup that surfaces the > existence of and relationships between entities in health/medical web > pages. When other ontologies and/or controlled vocabularies are available, > our proposed schema can link to and take advantage of them, e.g. via the > code property of MedicalEntity<http://schemaorg-medicalext.appspot.com/MedicalEntity>. > It is also not an initial goal to support automated reasoning, medical > records coding, or genomic tagging, as these would require substantially > more detailed (and hence high barrier-to-entry) modeling and markup; they > could be considered for future extensions. > > We look forward to your feedback! > > Thanks, > > Aaron Brown (Google) > > -- > Aaron Brown | Senior Product Manager | Google, Inc. | New York, NY > > > > > -- > -Thad > http://www.freebase.com/view/en/thad_guidry >
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 21:46:13 UTC