W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > May 2012

Re: For review: Schema.org / Good Relations integration

From: Myers, Jay <Jay.Myers@bestbuy.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:42:21 +0000
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
CC: "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Message-ID: <CBD2AB86.816%a576844@bestbuy.com>
This is great news for commerce :-)


On 5/11/12 11:30 AM, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:

>Via http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals
>Excerpting from http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/GoodRelations
>"""The schema.org team and Martin Hepp (Good Relations project lead)
>have been discussing integration of a version of Good Relations into
>The idea follows the precedent with IPTC's rNews, whose vocabulary was
>added in 2011. The schema.org site would give credit in a similar form
>to rNews, and Good Relations as a project would continue
>independently. However the majority of GR's terms would be reflected
>into schema.org's core vocabulary.
>* See 
>public working document]
>* The issues [https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/15 Add
>Time for xsd:time, DateTime for xsd:datetime] and [14: Schema.org
>booleans (True/False) vs RDF 'true/false'] stem from this
>* See also the [[WebSchemas/ExternalEnumerations|ExternalEnumerations]]
>* See [http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/ Good Relations]
>site for background, e.g.
>[http://wiki.goodrelations-vocabulary.org/Quickstart quickstart] page.
>* Schema.org already has [http://schema.org/Offer Offer] and related
>terms, but will benefit from adding detail from Good Relations. [...]
>I'm sure many of you here are famliar with Good Relations already.
>Martin Hepp and the schema.org team have been discussion the
>possibility of integrating GR into schema.org, following the precedent
>of the earlier IPTC/rNews schema which was added last year. The idea
>is that we would add class and property definitions from GR into
>schema.org, alongside source acknowledgement / credit in the relevant
>pages (see http://schema.org/Article for an rNews example).
>Martin has a public working document linked from
>http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/GoodRelations which has the full
>details. As you'll see this is a substantial piece of work, so we
>welcome in particular detailed review comments on the specifics. The
>issues http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/14 and
>http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/15 are directly related
Received on Friday, 11 May 2012 16:43:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:48:46 UTC