public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from January 2009 by date

Friday, 30 January 2009

• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang KANZAKI Masahide

Thursday, 29 January 2009

• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Tina Holmboe
• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Shane McCarron
• RE: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Phillips, Addison
• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Shane McCarron
• RE: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Misha Wolf
• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Shane McCarron
• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Tina Holmboe
• Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang Dan Brickley
• XHTML+RDFa and @lang Shane McCarron
• Re: Wordpress RDFa theme [was: Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml] Sam Kuper
• Re: Fwd: the white house uses RDFa Ivan Herman
• Fwd: the white house uses RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Wordpress RDFa theme [was: Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml] Toby A Inkster
• Re: the white house uses RDFa Ivan Herman
• Wordpress RDFa theme [was: Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml] Sam Kuper

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

• Re: the white house uses RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: the white house uses RDFa Manu Sporny
• the white house uses RDFa Ben Adida
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Dan Brickley
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Philip Taylor
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Toby A Inkster

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ben Adida
• Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml Sam Kuper
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Philip Taylor
• Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml Shane McCarron
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Stephane Corlosquet
• Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml Sam Kuper
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ben Adida
• ISSUE-188: LAST CALL COMMENT: Felix Sasaki I18N comment re japanese scripts SWD Issue Tracker

Monday, 26 January 2009

• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Philip Taylor
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ben Adida
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ben Adida
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Shane McCarron
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Toby Inkster
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ivan Herman
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Stephane Corlosquet
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Toby Inkster
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Julian Reschke
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Julian Reschke
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Sam Ruby
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Mark Birbeck
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Dan Brickley
• Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Ben Adida
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ben Adida

Sunday, 25 January 2009

• Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Ed Summers
• Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Ivan Herman
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Toby A Inkster

Saturday, 24 January 2009

• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Christoph LANGE
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Christoph LANGE
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Shane McCarron
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Christoph LANGE
• RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 Manu Sporny

Thursday, 22 January 2009

• Drupal, RSS/Atom, HTML5 points (was: meeting record: 2009-01-22 RDFa telecon) Dan Brickley
• meeting record: 2009-01-22 RDFa telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Problematic test cases in the RDFa test suite Manu Sporny
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Shane McCarron
• Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace Christoph LANGE
• Validation issue with the xsi namespace Stephane Corlosquet
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 22nd January 2009 Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 20 January 2009

• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Rob Crowther
• Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) Shane McCarron
• Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Dan Brickley
• Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Toby Inkster
• Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Julian Reschke
• Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Toby A Inkster
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Ivan Herman
• Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) Ivan Herman
• Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) Manu Sporny
• Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs Manu Sporny
• Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Manu Sporny

Monday, 19 January 2009

• Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 1/2) Manu Sporny

Sunday, 18 January 2009

• Re: full URIs where a CURIE expected? Manu Sporny
• Re: full URIs where a CURIE expected? Toby A Inkster
• full URIs where a CURIE expected? Dan Brickley

Saturday, 17 January 2009

• "Native" support for RDFa in Firefox (was: Re: browsers and RDFa (comments on my blog...)) Manu Sporny

Friday, 16 January 2009

• Re: RDFa use on RDFa wiki (MediaWiki) Sergey Chernyshev
• Re: RDFa in rdfa blog and wiki Sergey Chernyshev
• Re: Just a small note on an RDFa usage Niklas Lindström
• browsers and RDFa (comments on my blog...) Ivan Herman

Thursday, 15 January 2009

• Re: RDFa use on RDFa wiki (MediaWiki) Nathan Yergler
• RDFa in rdfa blog and wiki Wagner, Claudia
• Re: RDFa use on RDFa wiki (MediaWiki) Wagner, Claudia

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

• Re: RDFa use on RDFa wiki (MediaWiki) Wagner, Claudia
• Re: Just a small note on an RDFa usage Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Use Cases added to wiki Manu Sporny
• Re: W3C validator Shane McCarron
• Re: W3C validator Sam Kuper
• Re: RDFa Use Cases added to wiki Ivan Herman
• Just a small note on an RDFa usage Ivan Herman
• W3C validator Toby A Inkster

Tuesday, 13 January 2009

• [RDFa TC] Updates Michael Hausenblas
• RDFa Use Cases added to wiki Manu Sporny
• Parsing RDFa in Feeds Toby A Inkster

Monday, 12 January 2009

• Re: OpenID support is broken on RDFa wiki Ben Adida
• RDFa use on RDFa wiki (MediaWiki) Sergey Chernyshev
• OpenID support is broken on RDFa wiki Sergey Chernyshev
• Re: meeting record: 2009-01-08 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Sergey Chernyshev

Sunday, 11 January 2009

• Re: Problematic test cases in the RDFa test suite Christoph LANGE
• Re: Problematic test cases in the RDFa test suite Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Problematic test cases in the RDFa test suite Christoph LANGE

Saturday, 10 January 2009

• Re: meeting record: 2009-01-08 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: meeting record: 2009-01-08 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Toby A Inkster

Friday, 9 January 2009

• Re: meeting record: 2009-01-08 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Sergey Chernyshev
• Re: XHTML Vocab document Shane McCarron

Thursday, 8 January 2009

• meeting record: 2009-01-08 RDF-in-XHTML TF telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Comments on RDFa Primer Ben Adida
• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Manu Sporny
• Re: Holy grail Shane McCarron
• Re: Holy grail Sam Kuper
• Re: Holy grail Sam Kuper
• Re: Holy grail Shane McCarron
• Re: Holy grail Ivan Herman
• Re: Holy grail Sam Kuper
• XHTML Vocab document Toby A Inkster
• Re: Holy grail Shane McCarron
• Re: Holy grail Ivan Herman
• Comments on RDFa Primer Thomas Baker
• Re: Holy grail Sam Kuper
• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Ivan Herman
• Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 + RDFa Ivan Herman
• Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 + RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 + RDFa Doug Schepers
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 8 January 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Shane McCarron
• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Shane McCarron

Wednesday, 7 January 2009

• Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Mark Birbeck
• Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE Manu Sporny
• Test Case #122: "[:]" CURIE format is valid Manu Sporny
• Test Case #121: "[prefix:]" CURIE format is valid Manu Sporny
• Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? Ivan Herman
• Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? Shane McCarron
• Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? Manu Sporny
• Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? Shane McCarron
• Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? Ivan Herman
• Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (was: Re: Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X)) Manu Sporny
• Re: Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

• Re: Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X) Kingsley Idehen
• Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X) Manu Sporny
• Re: [Fwd: Trying to work out the problems solved by RDFa] Rob Crowther

Monday, 5 January 2009

• Re: Holy grail Sam Kuper
• Holy grail Sam Kuper
• Re: S5+RDFa + attribution to multiple people Sergey Chernyshev

Sunday, 4 January 2009

• Re: DC metadata in docs as part of HTML - comment Liddy Nevile
• Re: S5+RDFa + attribution to multiple people Nathan Yergler
• S5+RDFa + attribution to multiple people Sergey Chernyshev

Last message date: Friday, 30 January 2009 02:41:52 UTC