Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) from Rob Crowther on 2009-01-20 (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from January 2009)

From: Rob Crowther <robertc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:51:23 +0000
To: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Message-ID: <3ce2ebd20901200651v765ea394ua3198fab55b99355@mail.gmail.com>

2009/1/20 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>:
>
> For any specific use case, an RDF vocabulary expressed in RDFa is an
> inferior syntax and data model for that use case compared to a solution
> developed specifically for the use case.

If part of a use case was that more than one vocabulary was
used/needed, would you then allow that RDF/RDFa could have a superior
data model?

Rob

Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 14:51:59 UTC