Ben Adida
- the white house uses RDFa (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Tuesday, 27 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Tuesday, 27 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: Just a small note on an RDFa usage (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: OpenID support is broken on RDFa wiki (Monday, 12 January)
- Re: Comments on RDFa Primer (Thursday, 8 January)
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 8 January 2009 (Thursday, 8 January)
Christoph LANGE
Dan Brickley
Doug Schepers
Ed Summers
Henri Sivonen
Ivan Herman
- Re: Fwd: the white house uses RDFa (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: the white house uses RDFa (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 (Sunday, 25 January)
- Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) (Tuesday, 20 January)
- browsers and RDFa (comments on my blog...) (Friday, 16 January)
- Re: RDFa Use Cases added to wiki (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Just a small note on an RDFa usage (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 + RDFa (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Re: Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X) (Wednesday, 7 January)
Julian Reschke
KANZAKI Masahide
Kingsley Idehen
Liddy Nevile
Manu Sporny
- Re: the white house uses RDFa (Wednesday, 28 January)
- Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 (Sunday, 25 January)
- RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 (Saturday, 24 January)
- Re: Problematic test cases in the RDFa test suite (Thursday, 22 January)
- Telecon Agenda - Thursday 22nd January 2009 (Thursday, 22 January)
- Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Validator for HTML5+RDFa minus CURIEs (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 1/2) (Monday, 19 January)
- Re: full URIs where a CURIE expected? (Sunday, 18 January)
- "Native" support for RDFa in Firefox (was: Re: browsers and RDFa (comments on my blog...)) (Saturday, 17 January)
- Re: RDFa Use Cases added to wiki (Wednesday, 14 January)
- RDFa Use Cases added to wiki (Tuesday, 13 January)
- Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE (Thursday, 8 January)
- Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Test Case #122: "[:]" CURIE format is valid (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Test Case #121: "[prefix:]" CURIE format is valid (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (was: Re: Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X)) (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Firefox RDFa Debugger (Fuzzbot 0.8.4 for Windows/Linux/Mac OS X) (Tuesday, 6 January)
Mark Birbeck
Michael Hausenblas
Misha Wolf
Nathan Yergler
Niklas Lindström
Philip Taylor
Phillips, Addison
Ralph R. Swick
Rob Crowther
Sam Kuper
- Re: Wordpress RDFa theme [was: Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml] (Thursday, 29 January)
- Wordpress RDFa theme [was: Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml] (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml (Tuesday, 27 January)
- Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml (Tuesday, 27 January)
- Re: W3C validator (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Monday, 5 January)
- Holy grail (Monday, 5 January)
Sam Ruby
Sergey Chernyshev
Shane McCarron
- Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: XHTML+RDFa and @lang (Thursday, 29 January)
- XHTML+RDFa and @lang (Thursday, 29 January)
- Re: Serving XHTML+RDFa as application/xhtml+xml (Tuesday, 27 January)
- Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace (Monday, 26 January)
- Re: RDFa Design Tests for @prefix and @profile in HTML4/5 (Sunday, 25 January)
- Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace (Saturday, 24 January)
- Re: Validation issue with the xsi namespace (Thursday, 22 January)
- Re: [whatwg] Alternative method of declaring prefixes in RDFa (was Re: RDFa is to structured data, like canvas is to bitmap and SVG is to vector) (Tuesday, 20 January)
- Re: W3C validator (Wednesday, 14 January)
- Re: XHTML Vocab document (Friday, 9 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Holy grail (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Test Case #123: "[]" is a valid safe CURIE (Thursday, 8 January)
- Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (Wednesday, 7 January)
- Re: Is about="[talk:]" a valid CURIE? (Wednesday, 7 January)
Stephane Corlosquet
SWD Issue Tracker
Thomas Baker
Tina Holmboe
Toby A Inkster
Toby Inkster
Wagner, Claudia
Last message date: Friday, 30 January 2009 02:41:52 UTC