- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:01:51 -0500
- To: RDFa Developers <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > Manu Sporny wrote: >> >> curie := [ [ prefix ] ':' ] reference >> >> Which, I believe, means that this: >> >> about="[talk:]" >> >> is invalid, even if talk is specified as a valid prefix earlier in the >> document. >> > No, that's wrong. Reference can be an empty string according to the > associated RFC. Just got off the phone with Shane... He was kind enough to explain exactly how someone could understand this from reading the spec. There were two key points I was missing: 1. The CURIE statement is written in eBNF[1] - I thought it was written in some sort of W3C modified regex syntax. (eBNF statement) curie := [ [ prefix ] ':' ] reference 2. Not specifying anything for reference is technically valid per the IRI spec[2]. Here's how: reference := irelative-ref irelative-ref = irelative-part [ "?" iquery ] [ "#" ifragment ] irelative-part = "//" iauthority ipath-abempty / ipath-absolute / ipath-noscheme / ipath-empty ipath-empty = 0<ipchar> Therefore /reference/ can be /ipath-empty/ and thus, you can have: prefix: Just to see if this was just confusing me, or would confuse future implementers, I asked three of our engineers to briefly look at the CURIE section of the RDFa spec and state whether or not the following were valid CURIEs forms (Y means "Yes", N means "No", ? means "Don't know"): Y Y N prefix (Correct answer: N) N N N prefix: (Correct answer: Y) *current discussion topic Y Y Y prefix:reference (Correct answer: Y) N N N : (Correct answer: N) Y Y ? :reference (Correct answer: Y) Y Y Y reference (Correct answer: Y) This means that: 1. We need a test case clarifying this, which I'll put together. 2. Ivan gets to keep his implementation as-is... and librdfa will have to change :) -- manu [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Backus–Naur_form [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt -- Manu Sporny President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Fibers are the Future: Scaling Past 100K Concurrent Requests http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2008/10/21/scaling-webservices-part-2
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2009 19:02:32 UTC