RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-02 meeting 1600 UTC
ISSUE-62: Re-using public entity identifiers - external service call [R2RML]
ISSUE-61: Re-using public entity identifiers - look-up table [R2RML]
Why don't we have referencing subject/predicate/graph maps?
ISSUE-60 (simpler-logical-tables): Syntactic sugar for the simple case of logical tables [R2RML]
ISSUE-59 (simple-triples-maps): Syntactic sugar for triples maps that only have a single predicate-object map [R2RML]
R2RML spec - figures
Many-to-Many table in R2RML
ACTION-141 - Create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping
Proposal for the Direct Mapping
Correction to Minutes from July 26 Telcon
Minutes of 2011-07-26 telecon
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-26 meeting 1600 UTC
link errors in R2RML spec
RDB2RDF Test Cases document
ISSUE-58 (turtle-introduction): R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough [R2RML]
ISSUE-57 (r2rml-document-syntax): R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax [R2RML]
Review of R2RML working draft
More edits on the R2RML spec, incl. ISSUE-47
rdb2rdf test cases
R2RML implementation in XSPARQL
Closing a few more issues
Minutes of 2011-07-19 telecon
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC
Regrets for 19-JUL-2011 meeting
ISSUE-56 (template-termtype): Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI [R2RML]
ISSUE-55 (nested-maps): Nested predicate-object maps [R2RML]
ISSUE-54 (constant-term-map): Simpler constant-valued term maps [R2RML]
regrets for 19-JUL-2011 meeting
Implemented ISSUE-35 resolution on quoting and case sensitivity of identifiers
[Test Cases] DBs naming convention
Re-opening issues 47 and 29
ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
- Re: ISSUE-34, tableName
Minutes of 2011-07-12 telecon
ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings
- Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings
- Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings
update ACTION-136 [Fwd: ACTION-136]
updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]]
- Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]]
- Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]]
- Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]]
Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim
Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
Agenda for July 12 Telcon
ISSUE-53 (r2rml-in-rdfs): RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document [R2RML]
ISSUE-52 (extended-example): Extended example in the test cases document [Test Cases]
ISSUE-51 (ill-typed-literals): Handling of ill-typed literals [R2RML]
ISSUE-50 (validation): Validation criteria for mapping graphs [R2RML]
Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
- Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document?
Improvements to Direct Mapping definition
ISSUE-49 (sql-terminology): SQL terminology in R2RML [R2RML]
ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
- Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
- Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
- Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes
- Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes
- Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22
Revisiting ISSUE-29 (implicit or explicit conversion to strings)
late regrets for 5 July 2011 telecon
Fun with inverse expressions
Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)
- Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs)