- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <boris.villazon@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:09:03 +0100
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Hi I created an action for this, ACTION-140 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/140 Boris On 08/07/2011 12:29, RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > ISSUE-53 (r2rml-in-rdfs): RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document [R2RML] > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/53 > > Raised by: Richard Cyganiak > On product: R2RML > > The working group should produce an RDF Schema representation of the R2RML vocabulary terms. An obvious place to publish this would be as the namespace document for the rr: namespace. > > To follow best practice for publishing vocabularies [1], on the namespace URI there should also be a human-readable version of this RDF schema. This could take a form that's very close to the Property Summary table in the R2RML spec [2], but also listing the classes and instances (rr:defaultGraph, rr:SQL2008). > > The current table from the R2RML spec could then be replaced with a simpler and more compact Appendix that just lists all the terms and links to the place in the spec where they are defined, > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#R2rmlSchema_Properties > > > >
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 11:09:31 UTC