- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <boris.villazon@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:50:11 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: rdb2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi Richard On 21/07/2011 18:08, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Nice. > > Is there some way of creating a test case that's supposed to fail? For example, an invalid mapping file where some required property is missing? Yes, there is a way of creating a "incorrect" test case ... I'll create them ;) You already suggested some of them here [1], I'll create tcs for the TriplesMap. but, what would be the output of these "incorrect" test cases, an empty result with (or without) a error message? One option is an empty result and an error message pointing out what R2RML section is wrong/missing. what do you think? Boris [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Invalid_R2RML > > Richard > > > On 21 Jul 2011, at 16:41, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I was modifying (including more) test cases we have in the cvs repository [0]. >> Now they include a manifest file that describes the elements of the TCs. >> The manifest file follows the vocabulary we created in deri vocab [1]. You can also find the complete vocabulary here [2]. >> >> I renamed the result files, mapped*.trig, for mapped*.nq following Richard's suggestions. >> I also renamed the directGraph files *.ttl to *nt . >> >> Thanks to Nuno, I had to update less R2RML files to the current specification. >> However, I'll need to update the "specificationReference" property of the descriptions. >> >> Boris >> >> >> [0] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdb2rdf-tests >> [1] http://vocab.deri.ie/rdb2rdftc >> [2] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/ontologies/rdb2rdf-test.owl >> >
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 20:50:41 UTC