Re: More edits on the R2RML spec, incl. ISSUE-47

Great!  Many thanks!
All the best, Ashok

On 7/22/2011 11:44 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> I've spent the day on R2RML and knocked a few actions and issues off the to-do list.
>
>> Implement ISSUE-34 resolution: drop rr:tableOwner, and instead state that rr:tableName MAY be qualified to include a schema name and a catalog name
> Done, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-table-or-view-name
>
>> Implement ISSUE-45 resolution by replacing literals for rr:termTypes with three new IRIs rr:IRI, rr:BlankNode, and rr:Literal
> Done, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#termtype and elsewhere
>
>> Implement ISSUE-47 resolution as proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0084.htm and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0097.html and mark PENDINGREVIEW
> Done, mostly by adding a new subsection on data errors:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#data-errors
>
> Also:
>
> - improved the Vocabulary Summary section (ISSUE-53)
>
> - moved (with Boris' help) the extended example to the Test Cases (ISSUE-52)
>
> - gave up on ISSUE-49 (defining SQL terminology in R2RML) -- I defined one more non-obvious term in the spec, and that will have to do, so I'm now in favour of POSTPONE on this one
>
> Best,
> Richard

Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 18:47:35 UTC