- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:48:08 +0100
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Here are some more candidate issues that we can quickly get rid of: ISSUE-7: Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7 [[ PROPOSAL: The WG is of the opinion that the charter's requirement to support the linked data principles is adequately addressed by the Direct Mapping and R2RML, with the caveat that ISSUE-43 is not yet resolved. No further action is required beyond resolving ISSUE-43. This closes ISSUE-7. ]] (ISSUE-43 is “Re-using public entity identifiers”.) ISSUE-56: Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/56 This seems like a no-brainer to me, so perhaps it can be quickly accepted without requiring further discussion. So: [[ PROPOSAL: Resolve ISSUE-56 by accepting the change proposed in the issue description. ]] ISSUE-50: Validation criteria for mapping graphs http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/50 This was just a call for others to review a particular section of the spec. It can be closed without action, which I just did. Addressing any of the other issues will actually require some discussion/work :-/ Best, Richard
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2011 08:48:37 UTC