- From: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:24:11 -0400
- To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Jul 13, 2011, at 09:58 AM, David McNeil wrote:
> I agree with what I think I hear others saying. We don't need to address JDBC connections, or any other connection properties for 1.0 of the R2RML spec. So I think we can postpone this issue.
POSTPONE is OK with me.
Regards,
Ted
--
A: Yes. http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
// http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 15:24:51 UTC