Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC

Dear All,

Regrets for today (deadline mode).

All the best,

Marcelo

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Michael Hausenblas
<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Below the agenda for today's telecon: you'll see in the agenda that I'm
> experimenting with an 'issue pipeline' (RAISED -> OPEN -> Issue(s) of the
> day) - more details during the call.
>
>
> Cheers,
>        Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2011-07-19
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> *16:00-17:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=07&day=19&year=2011&hour=16&min=00&sec=0
>
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF")
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Chair: Michael
>
>
> 1. Admin
>
> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last
> meetinghttp://www.w3.org/2011/07/12-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>
>
> 2. Issue(s) of the day
>
>
> - ISSUE-34
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/34
>
> As per
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0077.html it
> seems that the majority agrees with:
>
> [[ PROPOSAL: To resolve ISSUE-34, drop rr:tableOwner, and instead state that
> rr:tableName MAY be qualified to include a schema name and a catalog name ]]
> If you do have a counter-proposal make sure you have it prepared up-front.
>
>
> 3. OPEN issues
>
>
> - ISSUE 2: RDF Syntaxes
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0165.html
>
> - ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jun/0111.html
> Souri has action to suggest IRIs
>
> - ISSUE-47 (Invalid-iris):  What happens when rr:column, rr:template, etc
> produce invalid IRIs?
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0002.html
>
> - ISSUE-48 Mapping SQL Datatypes to RDF
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0010.html
>
> - ISSUE 22:  SQL Identifiers
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0007.html
>
> - ISSUE-29:  Implicit or explicit conversion to strings
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Jul/0006.html
>
> - ISSUE-37: DB Connection details in R2RML
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/37
>
>
>
> 4. RAISED issues
>
> - ISSUE-43 Re-using public entity identifiers
> - ISSUE-45 IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices
> - ISSUE-47 What happens when rr:column, rr:template etc produce invalid
> IRIs?
> - ISSUE-48 Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF
> - ISSUE-49 SQL terminology in R2RML
> - ISSUE-50 Validation criteria for mapping graphs
> - ISSUE-51 Handling of ill-typed literals
> - ISSUE-52 Extended example in the test cases document
> - ISSUE-53 RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document
> - ISSUE-54 Simpler constant-valued term maps
> - ISSUE-55 Nested predicate-object maps
> - ISSUE-56 Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI
>
>
>
> 5. AOB
>
>
> Cheers,
>        Michael
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 14:27:35 UTC