public-media-fragment@w3.org from March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: short report of 2010-03-31 teleconference Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Philip Jägenstedt
• short report of 2010-03-31 teleconference Raphaël Troncy
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Raphaël Troncy
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Conrad Parker
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Raphaël Troncy

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

• Re: user of media fragments Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: user of media fragments Raphaël Troncy
• user of media fragments Silvia Pfeiffer

Monday, 29 March 2010

• Re: ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite Thierry MICHEL
• Re: ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite Raphaël Troncy
• ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite Thierry MICHEL

Thursday, 25 March 2010

• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• Re: publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD Raphaël Troncy
• Re: publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD Thierry MICHEL
• publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD Thierry MICHEL
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Davy Van Deursen

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Davy Van Deursen
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Silvia Pfeiffer

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Silvia Pfeiffer
• CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Davy Van Deursen
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? Davy Van Deursen
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? Silvia Pfeiffer
• Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? Raphaël Troncy

Monday, 22 March 2010

• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Silvia Pfeiffer
• ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP Davy Van Deursen

Friday, 19 March 2010

• Re: Update your stylesheet before generating a new HTML version of the spec Silvia Pfeiffer
• Update your stylesheet before generating a new HTML version of the spec Raphaël Troncy

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Philip Jägenstedt
• ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI Raphaël Troncy
• CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Raphaël Troncy

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Davy Van Deursen
• Re: Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC erik mannens
• Re: [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* Yves Lafon
• Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) Yves Lafon
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* Raphaël Troncy
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Raphaël Troncy

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Segment production rule Philip Jägenstedt
• Issue of combining multiple dimensions Silvia Pfeiffer

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Media Fragment validation service Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Silvia Pfeiffer
• 5th F2F meeting: second day summary Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Segment production rule Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Segment production rule Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: Segment production rule Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Conrad Parker
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Ran into a problem with corrib... Michael Hausenblas
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Conrad Parker
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Yves Lafon
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Yves Lafon
• Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Conrad Parker
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Raphaël Troncy
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Conrad Parker
• 5th F2F meeting: first day summary Raphaël Troncy
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Media Fragment validation service Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (from Conrad) Conrad Parker
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Media Fragment validation service Raphaël Troncy
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Raphaël Troncy
• Objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (from Conrad) Raphaël Troncy
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Conrad Parker
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Raphaël Troncy
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes Raphaël Troncy

Monday, 8 March 2010

• bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections Conrad Parker
• minutes from yesterday and some fixes Silvia Pfeiffer
• Ran into a problem with corrib... Jack Jansen
• ISSUE-16: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by LC, but we should write somewhere that this is doable Media Fragments Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Media Fragment validation service Davy Van Deursen
• ACTION-141 done: clarify the role of the UA for rendering a media fragment Conrad Parker
• Re: Track fragments Conrad Parker
• Re: Track fragments Silvia Pfeiffer
• ACTION-144 done Silvia Pfeiffer

Sunday, 7 March 2010

• Re: W3C TPAC2010 Meeting Schedule: 1-5 November, Lyon, France Silvia Pfeiffer
• W3C TPAC2010 Meeting Schedule: 1-5 November, Lyon, France Raphaël Troncy
• 5th F2F Meeting Agenda Raphaël Troncy
• ACTION-143 done Silvia Pfeiffer

Saturday, 6 March 2010

• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker

Friday, 5 March 2010

• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Yves Lafon
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Yves Lafon
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Yves Lafon
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Yves Lafon
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Jack Jansen

Thursday, 4 March 2010

• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Raphaël Troncy
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Raphaël Troncy
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker
• Re: Percent encoding Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Percent encoding Philip Jägenstedt
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Conrad Parker
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Jack Jansen

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

• Re: Percent encoding Yves Lafon
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Silvia Pfeiffer
• The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response Raphaël Troncy
• minutes of 2010-03-03 teleconference Raphaël Troncy
• ISSUE-15: Which def should we take? Media Fragments Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC DENOUAL Franck
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC erik mannens
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Silvia Pfeiffer
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC DENOUAL Franck
• Re: Formatting of the minutes Silvia Pfeiffer

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

• Re: Percent encoding Silvia Pfeiffer
• Re: Percent encoding Raphaël Troncy
• Media Fragments Home page updated Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Percent encoding Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Percent encoding Jack Jansen
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Jack Jansen
• Re: Formatting of the minutes Jack Jansen
• Re: Percent encoding Philip Jägenstedt
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Percent encoding Raphaël Troncy
• Re: Formatting of the minutes Raphaël Troncy

Monday, 1 March 2010

• Re: Percent encoding Philip Jägenstedt

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 12:05:30 UTC