- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 01:29:13 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On 4 mrt 2010, at 02:14, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > Raphael's question was not a question that poses itself in that > manner. The Multipart bit is already defined for retrieval actions > that create multiple byte ranges as a reply rather than just one. So, > these are complimentary options, not alternatives!!! Duh. I stand corrected, next time I'll read more of the spec than just the bits I think are relevant at first glance:-) I'll read things more carefully before monday and form another opinion on the issue, -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 00:29:59 UTC