- From: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:49:12 +0900
- To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
2010/3/31 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>: > Dear Media Fragmenters, > > [Apologies for this late notice] > Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=31&month=03&year=2010&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > Actions opened: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open > We are back to the same hour than before for the Europeans ... but not yet > for Silvia and Conrad :-( Do you have daylight saving times? ahh, not for me -- there is no daylight saving time in Japan. Regrets from me, I will not be able to make it home in time for 18:00. Is this going to be the UTC time for the teleconf from now on? (If so I'll have to try to reshuffle my Wednesday schedule ...) Conrad. > > The agenda is actually the same than 2 weeks ago when we canceled the > telecon. We must decide what we publish by the end of the week. > Best regards. > > Erik & Raphaël > > ------------ > > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-03-31 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Wednesday, 31 March *09:00-10:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=31&month=03&year=2010&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > > 31 March 2010, 0900 UTC > 0200 (West US) > 1000 (Galway) > 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) > 1800 (Tokyo) > 2000 (Sydney) > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 > Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 > Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") > Duration : 60 minutes > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 > W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc > Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client > Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim > Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html > Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Raphael > ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList > Scribe: Conrad (On Deck: Silvia, Michael) > Regrets: Erik, Davy > > Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by > members and invited experts only. > > 1. ADMIN: > * Roll call > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 03 March 2010 telecon: > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/03-mediafrag-minutes.html > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 5th F2F meeting: > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/08-mediafrag-minutes.html > http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-mediafrag-minutes.html > > * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing > list and notifications > * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers > ** Postpone (new deadline is May 1st 2010) > > * Next WG F2F: > - 25-30 April in Raleigh, collocated with WWW (HTML5 Track?) > - 01-03 June in Heraklion, collocated with ESWC > - 14-16 June in Sophia Antipolis/Amsterdam > - 25-26 or 28-29 June in New York, collocated with FOMS+OVC > > 2. USE CASES & REQUIREMENTS > > * ACTION-156: Conrad to add a "bandwidth conservation use case" > > 3. SPECIFICATION: > > 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) > > * ACTION-151: Yves to modify the production rule for the track dimension in > order to allow multiple semi-colon separated values > * ACTION-152: Yves to change the formal syntax to reflect that we don't need > a subdelim for selecting multiple tracks but we allow multiple track= in the > URI > * ACTION-153: Raphael to review the complete document and check whether > there are more references to uniqueness > > 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP: > * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax > * ACTION-154: Yves to add a section 5.2.4 describing his new optimization > * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1 is implementable using the protocol > * ACTION-155: Davy to draw diagrams to include in the spec, similar to > Yves's email, that shows which bytes from the headers and body of the media > file are sent > > 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA: > * ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 7 regarding spatial and track > dimension > * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at > client-side > > 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: > * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? > * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html > * Silvia's blog post: > http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/ > * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE, > MPEG-21) vs the semantics > > 4. TEST CASES: (Michael) > * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ > * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test cases for > temporal fragments > * ACTION-158: Raphael to enter the big table of all test cases for the > temporal dimension in the wiki > * ACTION-147: Michael to add all MF WG members to corrib > * ACTION-148: Michael to add a copy TC functionality in corrib > * ACTION-149: Michael to come up with a fix for overview vs. edit single TC > in corrib > * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html > > 5. ISSUES > > 5.1 Active: > > 5.2 Non-Active: > * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding > * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing > * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? > * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites > and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? > * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the > fragment scheme for all media types > * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps > * ISSUE-16 [Jack]: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by LC, > but we should write somewhere that this is doable > > 6. IMPLEMENTATION: > * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could > implement the logic on client side > * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic > could be implemented on client side > * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing > the parsing on client side of the media fragment > * Someone to investigate whether he could have an implementation in > Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing? > > 7. AOB > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ > > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 06:49:47 UTC