Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC

I will not be able to attend the meeting. All my actions continue to
be open, but will be done for the F2F as promised.
Regards,
Silvia.

2010/3/2 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>:
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
>
> Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=03&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
> Actions opened:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
>
> This is our last telecon before the F2F meeting. We need to have most of our
> actions done before the F2F so we can discuss issues. We will focus the
> discussion on:
>  - all the ACTIONS you would have _done_ ;-) we have way too many open!
>  - good preparation of the F2F: add your topic!
>  - there are a lot of small actions on TC, I'm also worried on their
> progress.
> Best regards.
>
> Erik & Raphaël
>
> ------------
>
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-03-03
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday, 03 March *10:00-11:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=03&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
>
> 03 March 2010, 1000 UTC
>              0200 (West US)
>              1000 (Galway)
>              1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
>              1900 (Tokyo)
>              2100 (Sydney)
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Chair: Raphael, Erik
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
> Scribe: Conrad (On Deck: Silvia, Michael)
> Regrets:
>
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
> members and invited experts only.
>
> 1. ADMIN:
> * Roll call
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 24 February 2009 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * ACTION-145: Raphaël to adjust the milestones in the charter
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
> ** Postpone (new deadline is May 1st 2010)
>
> 2. F2F Meeting:
> * Draft Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda
>
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
>
> * ACTION-134: Erik to mark up the spec with normative and informative
> classes [postpone?]
> * ACTION-144: Silvia to move the section 5.1.1 to the top
> * ACTION-143: Silvia to move 5.1.5 into a new section
> * ACTION-142: Raphaël to apply this change in the section 5.1.3 (jack's
> note)
>
> 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
>
> * Yves has fixed all bugs on the wiki page:
> ** Bug in the npt specification from Philip
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
> ** Bug from Dom
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0093.html
> ** Drop the 's' and point to http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
> ** ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt
> ** Add an annex where all the syntax is grouped together?
>
> * ACTION-150: Erik to summarize the discussion on the quotes in a mail or on
> the wiki
> * ACTION-132: Philip to send to the mailing list a description of a new
> issue to be discussed (dealing with decimal for specifying time?)
>
> 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP:
> * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax
>
> 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA:
> * ACTION-135: Davy, Erik to extend section 5 regarding spatial and track
> dimension
> * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1.4 is implementable using the protocol
> * ACTION-141: Conrad to add a paragraph in the section 5.2.1 that further
> clarify the role of the UA for rendering a media fragment
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
> client-side
>
> 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
> * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
> * Silvia's blog post:
> http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/
> * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE,
> MPEG-21) vs the semantics
>
> 3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
> * Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
> * Franck revival:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Feb/0025.html
>
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
> * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/
> * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20)
> * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing
> list and notifications
> * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test cases for
> temporal fragments
> * ACTION-147: Michael to add all MF WG members to corrib
> * ACTION-148: Michael to add a copy TC functionality in corrib
> * ACTION-149: Michael to come up with a fix for overview vs. edit single TC
> in corrib
> * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html
>
> 5. ISSUES
>
> 5.1 Active:
>
> 5.2 Non-Active:
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
> * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites
> and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
> * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the
> fragment scheme for all media types
> * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps
>
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
> implement the logic on client side
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic
> could be implemented on client side
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing
> the parsing on client side of the media fragment
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an implementation
> in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing
>
> 7. AOB
>
> --
> Raphaël Troncy
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 08:46:09 UTC