- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:44:59 +1100
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
Hi Davy, I think some of the "durations" have gone wrong... I believe 50 is the duration of the file in sec and 59000 is the bytes, right? I'm making change suggestions based on this: Single Byterange: 5.2.3: Should Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/59 be Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/50 ? 5.2.4: Should Content-Range: t:npt 10-20/59 be Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/59 ? And should Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/59 be Content-Range: t:npt 10-20/50 ? and should Content-Range-Mapping: bytes 0-2000/32000 be Content-Range: bytes 0-2000/59000 ? (Note both the change with -Mapping and the duration) Multiple Byte Ranges: 5.2.1: I believe it is also possible to pack two byte ranges in one request, i.e. ask for Range: bytes=2000-13000 Range: bytes=24000-28000 in one request. Yves? Then the reply is also a multipart/byteranges and one round trip is saved. Should Content-Range: bytes 2000-13000/32000 and Content-Range: bytes 24000-28000/32000 be Content-Range: bytes 2000-13000/59000 and Content-Range: bytes 24000-28000/59000 ? 5.2.2 Should Content-Range: bytes 2000-13000/32000 and Content-Range: bytes 24000-28000/32000 be Content-Range: bytes 2000-13000/59000 and Content-Range: bytes 24000-28000/59000 ? 5.2.4 Should it have a Content-Range-Mapping: track video; include-setup instead of Content-Range: track video header? And should Content-Range-Mapping: bytes 0-2000/32000 and Content-Range-Mapping: bytes 2000-13000/32000 and Content-Range-Mapping: bytes 24000-28000/32000 be Content-Range: bytes 0-2000/59000 and Content-Range: bytes 2000-13000/59000 and Content-Range: bytes 24000-28000/59000 ? (Note both the change with -Mapping and the duration) Cheers, Silvia. On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be> wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > On mrt 24, 2010 at 00:51, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> Can you attach the new diagrams? > > I updated the file on the wiki, so you can access it with the same URL: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/images/3/38/Mediafragmenthead > ers.pdf. > > Best regards, > > Davy > > -- > Davy Van Deursen > > Ghent University - IBBT > Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab > URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:45:52 UTC