public-media-fragment@w3.org from March 2010 by author

Conrad Parker

• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (from Conrad) (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Monday, 8 March)
• ACTION-141 done: clarify the role of the UA for rendering a media fragment (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Track fragments (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Saturday, 6 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)

Davy Van Deursen

• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Thursday, 25 March)
• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Wednesday, 24 March)
• RE: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Tuesday, 23 March)
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? (Tuesday, 23 March)
• ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Monday, 22 March)
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: Media Fragment validation service (Monday, 8 March)

DENOUAL Franck

• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 3 March)
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 3 March)

erik mannens

• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• RE: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 3 March)

Jack Jansen

• Ran into a problem with corrib... (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Formatting of the minutes (Tuesday, 2 March)

Media Fragments Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-16: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by LC, but we should write somewhere that this is doable (Monday, 8 March)
• ISSUE-15: Which def should we take? (Wednesday, 3 March)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Ran into a problem with corrib... (Tuesday, 9 March)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Segment production rule (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Segment production rule (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Monday, 1 March)

Raphaël Troncy

• short report of 2010-03-31 teleconference (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: user of media fragments (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 24 March)
• CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Update your stylesheet before generating a new HTML version of the spec (Friday, 19 March)
• ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 17 March)
• CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: Media Fragment validation service (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• 5th F2F meeting: second day summary (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Segment production rule (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Segment production rule (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• 5th F2F meeting: first day summary (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Media Fragment validation service (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (from Conrad) (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• W3C TPAC2010 Meeting Schedule: 1-5 November, Lyon, France (Sunday, 7 March)
• 5th F2F Meeting Agenda (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Wednesday, 3 March)
• minutes of 2010-03-03 teleconference (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Media Fragments Home page updated (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)
• Re: Formatting of the minutes (Tuesday, 2 March)

Silvia Pfeiffer

• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 31 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: short report of 2010-03-31 teleconference (Wednesday, 31 March)
• Re: user of media fragments (Tuesday, 30 March)
• user of media fragments (Tuesday, 30 March)
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Thursday, 25 March)
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: CANCEL: Media Fragments Working Group 24 March, Telecon 0900 UTC (Wednesday, 24 March)
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: availability this week? (Tuesday, 23 March)
• Re: ACTION-155: Figures illustrating URI fragment Resolution in HTTP (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: Update your stylesheet before generating a new HTML version of the spec (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: ACTION-158: Exhaustive list of Test Cases for the temporal dimension in the Media Fragment URI (Wednesday, 17 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Issue of combining multiple dimensions (Wednesday, 10 March)
• Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Spec layering: name-value pairs and beyond (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: Media Fragment validation service (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• minutes from yesterday and some fixes (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: Track fragments (Monday, 8 March)
• ACTION-144 done (Monday, 8 March)
• Re: W3C TPAC2010 Meeting Schedule: 1-5 November, Lyon, France (Sunday, 7 March)
• ACTION-143 done (Sunday, 7 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Thursday, 4 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 03 March, Telecon 1000 UTC (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Formatting of the minutes (Wednesday, 3 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Tuesday, 2 March)

Thierry MICHEL

• Re: ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite (Monday, 29 March)
• ACTION-220 to Investigate into the "wttjs" tool to transform WebIDL example into testsuite (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD (Thursday, 25 March)
• publication of Media Fragments URI 1.0 as a WD (Thursday, 25 March)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [ERRATA] Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 17 March, Telecon *0900 UTC* (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary) (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: bandwidth conservation use case, objection to use of Range for non-byte sections (Tuesday, 9 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response (Friday, 5 March)
• Re: Percent encoding (Wednesday, 3 March)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 12:05:30 UTC