The Intuitive/ Requirement
Preparing for 2nd Public Working Draft
Use case - todo for Henry from 2/18 discussion
regrets for next week
LDP Minutes of February 25
ISSUE-37 proposed text intro section
- ISSUE-37: short description of model
Affordances wiki page
LDP Issues Tracking Zeitgeist in Linked Data form
LDP Agenda for February 25
Fwd: Turtle is a W3C Candidate Recommendation
LDP Minutes for Februart 18
ISSUE-13
LDP Agenda for February 18
ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document
- Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document
- Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document
- Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document
- Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document
ldp-ISSUE-49 (Canonical-URI): Canonical URL - how to communicate its value to clients
LDP Scribe duty
NEW ISSUE Can a Client Set the Page Size?
Edits made for issues 10 & 11, and other updates
LDP Minutes February 11
ISSUE-33
Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
LDP Agenda for February 11
Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP
- Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP
- Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP
- Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP
- Re: Example of Atom publication using LDP
LDP Minutes for February 4
Re: ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology
Re: LDP Agenda for February 4 - please read!
Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core]
Re: ldp-ISSUE-11 (Server-managed properties): Do we need to define server-managed properties or do we leave them to applications? [Linked Data Platform core]
Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- RE: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- RE: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
- Re: ldp-ISSUE-10 (Guidance around ETags): Include clarifications and guidance around ETags [Linked Data Platform core]
Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax
- Re: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax
- Re: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax
- establishing conversational context (was: Creating non-Atom LDPRs: AtomStrict & AtomRelax)
POSTing binary data - the Atom Use Case
Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal
- Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal