Re: ISSUE-47 Proposal for LDP vocabulary document

On 13 Feb 2013, at 21:22, Steve Speicher <> wrote:

> I had my fingers near the original member submission vocabulary and
> was easy for me to tweak for what we current have in the spec [2].
> I propose that we close ISSUE-47 with the vocabulary at [2].
> I also propose the editors maintain this, along with the spec, to
> ensure consistency between the two.
> [1] -
> [2] -


It may be helpful to have a LDPR class and have LDPC be
a subclass of it.  I think we have agreement on this, and it
helps understanding. Also a pointer to the spec would probably 
be very useful for people coming across this document by 
following links.

> --
> - Steve Speicher

Social Web Architect

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 20:55:32 UTC