- From: Steve Battle <steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 14:04:01 +0000
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
On 1 Feb 2013, at 23:09, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi Arnaud: > Just to be clear, there are three proposals re. aggregation vs. containment: > > 1. Two classes of resources: containers and aggregators. When a container is deleted all its members > are deleted. When an aggregator its deleted its members are not deleted. > > 2. One class of resource with an attribute that can be set to allow either container or aggregator > behavior > > 3. One class of resource which contains either members or links to members. When a container is > deleted all its contents are deleted. You use links to get aggregator behavior. > > You are arguing for 1. correct? I thought the WG was moving towards 3. > > All the best, Ashok > Nice summary Ashok. Personally, I'm converging towards 3 :) Steve.
Received on Saturday, 2 February 2013 14:04:30 UTC