- From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 12:45:19 -0800
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF03676D7A.BD7B64E6-ON88257B05.00717959-88257B05.00720407@us.ibm.com>
Hi Henry, I think John's off today so I'll offer my understanding of his proposal. In John's proposal, Container is a subclass of Aggregation so if a resource is a Container it is by definition also an Aggregation. Whether a member resource gets deleted when a collection is deleted merely hinges on whether it is a Container (i.e., and an Aggregation) or only an Aggregation (i.e., and not a Container). In either case when a member resources is deleted it is removed from the collection. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 02/01/2013 12:18:26 PM: > From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> > To: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS, > Cc: public-ldp-wg@w3.org > Date: 02/01/2013 12:19 PM > Subject: Re: Issue-34 Back_to_Basics proposal > > Hi John, > > Reading your "Interaction Model" section, you point out that I added > an additional constraint > on HTTP DELETE, namely that deleting the resource removes it from > the containers > listing. As you seem to think it is a good idea, I wonder if one > should add that > as a new issue on its own. > > In the section "Creating a member resource" > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ > Issue-34:_Back_to_Basics#Creating_a_member_resource > > you have a resource that ends up being an Aggregation and a > Container. I don't understand how one would know how to distinguish > the meaning of rdfs:member in such a collection. Does the thing it > points to when deleted get remove from the container always? In > which case is there a point still to call it an Aggregation? > > Henry > > On 31 Jan 2013, at 22:01, John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > Not having seen any replies to [1], wondering if it got lost in the > shuffle. This is the same proposal [2] mentioned on this week's > call for how to resolve the issue and define an interaction model > covering both aggregation and composition. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jan/0330.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Issue-34:_Back_to_Basics > > Best Regards, John > > Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages > Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 20:51:35 UTC