- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:59:25 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 15:00:11 UTC
> Thanks, that helps a lot. Indeed it should be right at the top of > the page, as it explains very > tersely what the difference ontologically is that this makes. > > :Container rdfs:subClassOf :Aggregation . Henry, I look(ed) at that as a risky jump to make in the proposal, and a fairly obvious consequence of it *assuming one accepts its assertions*. Having someone call that out is evidence of understanding, so I'm happy my work here is done ;-) Just as in yours you mentioned some "optimizations". I was managing down the proposal size by omitting those to the degree I could. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 15:00:11 UTC