Re: ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology

Agree as well, that is why the member submission has one [1]

[1]: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/ldbp.rdf

On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:38 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> Yes from me.  Good idea.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 2013, at 17:09, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/47
>>
>> Raised by: Henry Story
>> On product:
>>
>> We should publish the LDP ontology as linked data and also have an
>> Ontology product in the tracker.
>>
>> The ontology should be published at <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp>
>> and can be as simple as this:
>>
>> [[
>> @prefix rdfs:    <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>.
>> @prefix vs: <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#> .
>>
>> <> rdfs:seeAlso <http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/> .
>>
>>
>> ldp:Resource a rdf:Class;
>>   rdfs:label "LDPR";
>>   vs:term_status "unstable" .
>>
>>
>> ldp:Container a rdf:Class;
>>    rdfs:label "LDPC";
>>    vs:term_status "unstable".
>>
>> ldp:Container rdfs:subClassOf ldp:Resource .
>>
>> ]]
>>
>> If new terms appear they can be proposed to be added to the vocabulary/ontology.
>> If restrictions appear to be useful they can be added there too. At least they can
>> be proposed, discussed, and voted on.
>>
>> When the spec is settled, more precise pointers to the spec for each item can
>> be added where needed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
- Steve

Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 15:17:33 UTC