- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:16:59 -0500
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Cc: Linked Data Platform Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Agree as well, that is why the member submission has one [1] [1]: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbp-20120326/ldbp.rdf On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:38 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Yes from me. Good idea. > > Regards, > Dave > -- > http://about.me/david_wood > > > > On Jan 28, 2013, at 17:09, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> ldp-ISSUE-47 (ontology): publish ontology >> >> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/47 >> >> Raised by: Henry Story >> On product: >> >> We should publish the LDP ontology as linked data and also have an >> Ontology product in the tracker. >> >> The ontology should be published at <http://www.w3.org/ns/ldp> >> and can be as simple as this: >> >> [[ >> @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#>. >> @prefix vs: <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#> . >> >> <> rdfs:seeAlso <http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/> . >> >> >> ldp:Resource a rdf:Class; >> rdfs:label "LDPR"; >> vs:term_status "unstable" . >> >> >> ldp:Container a rdf:Class; >> rdfs:label "LDPC"; >> vs:term_status "unstable". >> >> ldp:Container rdfs:subClassOf ldp:Resource . >> >> ]] >> >> If new terms appear they can be proposed to be added to the vocabulary/ontology. >> If restrictions appear to be useful they can be added there too. At least they can >> be proposed, discussed, and voted on. >> >> When the spec is settled, more precise pointers to the spec for each item can >> be added where needed. >> >> >> >> > -- - Steve
Received on Monday, 4 February 2013 15:17:33 UTC