- From: Roger Menday <Roger.Menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:09:08 +0000
- To: "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com>
- CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org Working Group" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <F9072E98-936A-44BD-962A-E414D040FCED@uk.fujitsu.com>
hi Erik, >> The LDP protocol provides the mechanism to observe and evolve state via >> interaction with the constituent Linked Data resources through their >> outgoing arcs. > > i think i am getting closer to understanding this, i was parsing it wrong. > but if the "through their outgoing arcs" refers to the "evolve state via > interaction" part, > then i am wondering what's wrong with just saying > "links"? I am kind of wary of using 'links' because it might be interpreted purely as 'actionable links'. I am referring to "what" happens - which is that the shape of the graph is changed - where the shape is defined by the resources and their properties/attributes/links/arcs/etc... The "how" is then the hypermedia controls (including links, forms), etc. > it's what people from the REST and hypermedia communities would > expect and understand, and for any actionable link that you use as > hypermedia control, In the above I would add, "actionable link *or form*" Or this that implied ... i.e. a form directs some action via a link (??) > it only makes sense if there is an identifier at the > target side. if there's no identifier, it's not a link, right? or said > differently, you cannot meaningfully link to the integer "42". http://km.aifb.kit.edu/projects/numbers/web/n42 But, I know what you mean, and it is potentially mis-leading in conjunction with the word 'link' But you can "arc" to it :) regards, Roger
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 22:09:59 UTC