- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:42:47 -0500
- To: public-ldp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <512CE607.7070208@openlinksw.com>
On 2/26/13 11:10 AM, Henry Story wrote: > As pointed out in my mail below the current spec does not make it possible > to post a Turtle document with relative URLs and get what one wants. > This is why > I proposed that one could define a subclass of LDPCs which I called > intuitive > LDPCs, that would allow this to work correctly. > > As Sandro pointed out yesterday we are not making much progress > currently, probably > because our intuitions are aligned. So this is an attempt to help us here. > > Apart from adding this to the best practices document one could perhaps > define such a subclass of LDPCs in our ontology, for those that would > like to use them > this would be very useful. It would follow Tim Berners Lee's suggstion > at the TPAC > meeting to take relative URIs seriously. > > So it looks like there are two things this thread could lead to > - best practice entry > - ontology improvement Please tweak the ontology. That's the best way to solve these kinds of intuition oriented matters. Others: Relative URLs are extremely important. They significantly reduce the cost of Linked Data deployment. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2013 16:43:14 UTC