Sunday, 30 August 2015
- DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP
- Re: GeoDCAT-AP: Call for public review
- Re: DQV vocabulary
- Re: GeoDCAT-AP: Call for public review
- Re: Invitation for public review of DCAT-AP
Friday, 28 August 2015
- [dwbp] Propose to close Issue-146
- DQV vocabulary
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-187: Target specific groups to ask for feedback on dqv
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow - Data quality vocab
- Introduction
Thursday, 27 August 2015
Wednesday, 26 August 2015
Tuesday, 25 August 2015
Monday, 24 August 2015
Friday, 21 August 2015
- dwbp-ACTION-196: Create updated timetable for duv in wiki
- dwbp-ACTION-195: Create updated timetable for bp document
- Re: Enrichment document
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow
- Position paper on data quality and trust using DQV
- Timelines for all deliverables,until F2F and after
Thursday, 20 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Agenda for tomorrow
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
Wednesday, 19 August 2015
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Spatial Data/Data on the Web BP relationship
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Spatial Data/Data on the Web BP relationship
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
Tuesday, 18 August 2015
Monday, 17 August 2015
- Standards - Decoupling Publishers and Consumers
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
Sunday, 16 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
Saturday, 15 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
Friday, 14 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-166: Should the data vocabularies section be removed? [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-188: Follow up with daq vocab people
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- dwbp-ACTION-194: Work through bp doc and see what issues can be resolved before the f2f
- dwbp-ACTION-193: Send draft agenda ideas to the chairs
- dwbp-ACTION-192: Invite inweb team to next week's meeting to discuss why the doc should/shouldn't be a wg note
- DAQ and DQV
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-197 (issues-github): Issue tracking and Github [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-197 (issues-github): Issue tracking and Github [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]
- dwbp-ISSUE-197 (issues-github): Issue tracking and Github [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary]
- Re: dwbp-ACTION-187: Target specific groups to ask for feedback on dqv
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
Thursday, 13 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: thoughts on the dataset usage vocab
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Agenda for tomorrow's meeting
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
Wednesday, 12 August 2015
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Compact Uniform Resource Identifier (COMURI)
- Re: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
Tuesday, 11 August 2015
Monday, 10 August 2015
Saturday, 8 August 2015
Friday, 7 August 2015
- dwbp-ACTION-191: Create examples following his suggestions on action 184
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: dwbp-ISSUE-166: Should the data vocabularies section be removed? [Best practices document(s)]
- Re: Enrichment document
- Re: agenda for tomorrow
- RE: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Re: agenda for tomorrow
Thursday, 6 August 2015
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- agenda for tomorrow
- Re: Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
- Data Identification section (was Re: reviewing the BP doc)
Wednesday, 5 August 2015
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST
Tuesday, 4 August 2015
- RE: Versioning
- Re: Versioning
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST
- FW: Invitation for public review of DCAT-AP
- RE: Versioning
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST
- Re: [dwbp] BP - URI structure is not relevant for REST