- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:16:36 -0700
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Cc: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
No, I think what you have is fine. And I think the BP doc for DWBP should follow suit. I completely agree that we should offer a short list of open-ended examples and make it clear that the format chosen should be suited to the community. That’s what my earlier note meant to espouse. -Annette -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 510-495-2935 On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: > hello annette. > >> On Aug 12, 2015, at 11:17, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: >> Your own doc says "Documents should use standardized data metamodels such as CSV, XML, RDF, or JSON”. Why would you not want the DWBP doc to do the same? > > it's meant as an open-ended list of examples, not as a closed set of metamodels people should use. maybe the phrasing isn't good enough, if you have suggestions for improvement, please let me know. > > the main point is: if a community is really invested in ASN.1 because that's what everybody uses, knows how to use, and has tools to use, this would be an entirely legimitate choice as well. but that community would still need to define and document the model they encode in ASN.1, and ideally this model should be hypermedia. if it's not, it's not webby. > > cheers, > > dret.
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2015 19:17:13 UTC