Re: Agenda for tomorrow - Data quality vocab

Hi all,

sending my regrets too.

cheers,
Berna

2015-08-27 15:43 GMT-03:00 Laufer <laufer@globo.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> Sending my regrets. Sorry for that. Good meeting.
>
> Abraços,
> Laufer
>
>
>
> 2015-08-27 13:25 GMT-03:00 Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> This week's agenda is now up.  Speak tomorrow!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>    Hadley
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150828
>>
>>
>> == Main agenda ==
>>
>> * Data Quality Vocabulary
>> ** http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/
>> ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181 - Should we have only
>> the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class
>> dqv:QualityMetadata?
>> ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/182 - The label of
>> daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model -
>> ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197 - Issue tracking and
>> Github
>> *** PROPOSAL: to remove the link to Github
>> ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/180 - Are we actually
>> allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ?
>> *** PROPOSAL: to re-define in the DQV namespace all the classes and
>> properties we need to express quality metadata, and map the new classes and
>> properties to the ones of DAQ
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> .  .  .  .. .  .
> .        .   . ..
> .     ..       .
>



-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------