- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:50:22 +0200
- To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, Following last week's call, here's a small list of items related to DQV, which we could discuss during a slice of the coming DWBP call. The idea is to start very soft, with some procedural/housekeeping/very general issues, on which Riccardo and I think we could move on even during Christophe's holidays. The following actions could be closed: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/152 - Follow up on the resolution re starting with the ods list, makx's list etc, working towards fpwd asap (that one was for the previous draft, actually!) https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/187 - Target specific groups to ask for feedback on dqv https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/188 - Follow up with daq vocab people The following items could be discussed. And hopefully closed, as the email discussion has covered a lot of ground: https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197 - Issue tracking and Github PROPOSAL: to remove the link to Github https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/180 - Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? PROPOSAL: to re-define in the DQV namespace all the classes and properties we need to express quality metadata, and map the new classes and properties to the ones of DAQ Best, Antoine and Riccardo
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2015 22:50:53 UTC