- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:08:31 -0400
- To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
- CC: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
hello annette.
On 2015-08-14 10:52, Annette Greiner wrote:
> Also, to disambiguate a little, when I say graph data, I don't mean "data shown in a graph". I mean data representing a mathematical graph, as in genome assembly data, or network connection data, a connection matrix.
any data that goes beyond a single value is a graph or at least can be
modeled as such, right? just ask the RDF folks. given that, how would
you clearly distinguish between data that "really is" a graph and data
that just "is modeled" as one?
i understand the desire to draw simple and rigid lines, but i am fairly
certain that you will run into the same "structure is in the eye of the
beholder" issue that everybody else does. but i'll simply sit back now
and see whether there will be some strict partition of "digital stuff"
into "data" and "non-data" that everybody can live with.
cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 15:09:05 UTC