- From: Hadley Beeman <hadley@linkedgov.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:25:59 +0100
- To: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 16:26:27 UTC
Hi all This week's agenda is now up. Speak tomorrow! Cheers, Hadley https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20150828 == Main agenda == * Data Quality Vocabulary ** http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/ ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/181 - Should we have only the existing class daq:QualityGraph or keep the new class dqv:QualityMetadata? ** http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/182 - The label of daq:QualityGraph does not fit well with the current model - ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/197 - Issue tracking and Github *** PROPOSAL: to remove the link to Github ** https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/180 - Are we actually allowed by W3C to re-use elements from DAQ? *** PROPOSAL: to re-define in the DQV namespace all the classes and properties we need to express quality metadata, and map the new classes and properties to the ones of DAQ
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2015 16:26:27 UTC