RE: Use machine-readable standardized data formats / Use non-proprietary data formats


You hit the problems spot on:

> I'm trying not to rule out things like graph data.
> I think 3D models are out of scope, whether of sculptures or molecules. If
> model is broken down into data, then it is in scope. 

To be clear, I wasn't talking about paper and glue 3D models, but about
digital representations of objects and phenomena in space. How can you say
that is not 'data'?


Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 14:25:53 UTC