W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2006 by date

Wednesday, 31 May
- RE: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Rogers, Tony
- RE: New Woden Results Arthur Ryman
- RE: New Woden Results Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Roberto Chinnici
- Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Roberto Chinnici
- RE: Component Model Results Arthur Ryman
- Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Arthur Ryman
- RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Arthur Ryman
- New Woden Results Arthur Ryman
- Fw: Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Arthur Ryman
- Re: Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} Jacek Kopecky
- Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Jacek Kopecky
- Violated Assertions added to TestMetadata.xml Arthur Ryman
- RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
- RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
- RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Rogers, Tony
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
- Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding Arthur Ryman
- RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
Tuesday, 30 May
- RE: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
- sparql-protocol-query.wsdl Jonathan Marsh
- Interop topics and references Jonathan Marsh
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
- RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
- RE: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Arthur Ryman
- Agenda: 23 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
- RE: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Jonathan Marsh
Thursday, 25 May
- Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)
Wednesday, 24 May
- Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)
- Suggestion to change {safety} to {safe} John Kaputin (gmail)
- Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 John Kaputin (gmail)
- Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 John Kaputin (gmail)
- Re: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother John Kaputin (gmail)
Friday, 26 May
- HTTPHeader name should be xs:string, not xs:QName John Kaputin (gmail)
Tuesday, 23 May
- Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties John Kaputin (gmail)
Tuesday, 30 May
- Re: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Arthur Ryman
- Re: SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Youenn Fablet
- SparqlQuery-1G missing schemaLocation Jonathan Marsh
- RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding John Kaputin (gmail)
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
- RE: "interface" attribute info item on service component Rogers, Tony
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
- RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Rogers, Tony
- Re: FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
- Re: "interface" attribute info item on service component Arthur Ryman
- RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Arthur Ryman
- Re: Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Arthur Ryman
- Re: Inline schemas with no target namespace Arthur Ryman
- Re: Questions on {http method} and {safety} extension properties Arthur Ryman
- Re: When does {safety} appear? Arthur Ryman
- Re: when does wsoap:code appear? Arthur Ryman
Monday, 29 May
- Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 Arthur Ryman
- Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 Arthur Ryman
- RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Arthur Ryman
- RE: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Arthur Ryman
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
- RE: Interchange result update. Arthur Ryman
- Re: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding Arthur Ryman
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Control over Interface Extensions Arthur Ryman
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
Sunday, 28 May
- Control over Interface Extensions Ramkumar Menon
Friday, 26 May
- Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding John Kaputin (gmail)
- RE: Interchange result update. Lawrence Mandel
Thursday, 25 May
- No implementor call today? Lawrence Mandel
- RE: Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Jonathan Marsh
- RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh
Wednesday, 24 May
- RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Rogers, Tony
- Interchange result update. Jonathan Marsh
- RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh
- interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties Jonathan Marsh
- when does wsoap:code appear? Jonathan Marsh
- When does {safety} appear? Jonathan Marsh
Tuesday, 23 May
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Jonathan Marsh
- FW: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
- "interface" attribute info item on service component Ramkumar Menon
- RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
- Missing properties in the property summary (Core table d-1, second half) Jonathan Marsh
- RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Arthur Ryman
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
- Probable Regrets for May 25 telecons Arthur Ryman
Thursday, 18 May
- Regrets for 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Charlton Barreto
Tuesday, 23 May
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
- RE: Component Values Must Be Context Independent Jonathan Marsh
Monday, 22 May
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
- Re: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Youenn Fablet
Friday, 19 May
- Inline schemas with no target namespace Ramkumar Menon
- Parts 1 and 2 Treat Defaults Inconsistently with Eachother Arthur Ryman
- RE: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Rogers, Tony
- WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format - HTTP Error Code Format Arthur Ryman
- WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Update Arthur Ryman
- Part 2, 5.6.3 XML Representation of subcodes is inconsistent Arthur Ryman
- Re: Uniqueness of QNames in 'extends' attribute Arthur Ryman
Thursday, 18 May
- Minutes, 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
- Test Suite Additions and Woden Results Arthur Ryman
Wednesday, 17 May
- Agenda: 18 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
- RE: Some new interchange results Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Some new interchange results Arthur Ryman
Tuesday, 16 May
- RE: Some new interchange results Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Some new interchange results Arthur Ryman
- Some new interchange results Youenn Fablet
Thursday, 11 May
- Minutes, 11 May 2006 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
Wednesday, 10 May
- RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
- RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Sanjiva Weerawarana
Tuesday, 9 May
- Agenda: 11 May 2006 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Arthur Ryman
- RE: WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Jonathan Marsh
- Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2 Arthur Ryman
- Comment on Part 2, Section 5.9.3 Arthur Ryman
- WSDL 2.0 Component Model Interchange Format Updated with Part 2 Extensions Arthur Ryman
Monday, 8 May
- Re: RDF Mapping status report Jacek Kopecky
- RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
- RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Arthur Ryman
- RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
- Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Lawrence Mandel
- Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? Tom Jordahl
- Re: wsdl2.0 and basic profile 2.0 Arthur Ryman
- RDF Mapping status report Jacek Kopecky
Sunday, 7 May
- wsdl2.0 and basic profile 2.0 Sanjiva Weerawarana
- Re: Component Model Results Arthur Ryman
Saturday, 6 May
- Comments on Part 2, Chapter 6 Arthur Ryman
Friday, 5 May
- RE: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
- RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
Thursday, 4 May
- RE: Test results rollup Tom Jordahl
- Re: Test results rollup Roberto Chinnici
- RE: Test results rollup Rogers, Tony
- RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
- RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
- RE: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
- RE: Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
- Re: Test results rollup Arthur Ryman
- Part 2 Adjuncts Comments (1 -5) Arthur Ryman
- Test results rollup Jonathan Marsh
- Re: typeDefinitions property optional? Arthur Ryman
Wednesday, 3 May
- Re: typeDefinitions property optional? Amelia A Lewis
- RE: typeDefinitions property optional? Rogers, Tony
- typeDefinitions property optional? Jonathan Marsh
Tuesday, 2 May
- Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Jeremy Hughes
- Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Arthur Ryman
- Re: 27 April 2006 WSDL Implementer's call minutes Jeremy Hughes
Monday, 1 May
- RE: Component Model Results Lawrence Mandel

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 19:39:46 GMT
Archived on: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 19:39:48 GMT