W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

Re: when does wsoap:code appear?

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:39:46 -0400
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF884A3050.AD80A535-ON8525717E.0002B6DB-8525717E.0003A958@ca.ibm.com>
I agree that the spec needs to be tightened to achieve deterministic 
results.

I favour dropping #any and leaving the property as OPTIONAL. Absense of 
the property equals #any.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
05/24/2006 10:14 AM

To
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
cc

Subject
when does wsoap:code appear?






Similarly to safety, it?s not clear when wsoap:code and wsoap:subcode 
should appear.
 
Both of these properties are OPTIONAL, yet the mapping defaults the value 
to ?#any?.  Thus whether the property appears isn?t deterministic to the 
WSDL.  One implementation could leave it out (e.g. Woden) when it?s not in 
the WSDL, another could always put it in.
 
The fix seems to be to make the property REQUIRED when the soap binding is 
in effect, or to remove the ?#any? default and say that no value is the 
same as ?#any?.
 
 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com  ][  
http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes  ]
 
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 00:40:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT