W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

Interchange result update.

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 12:31:40 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E802B35560@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I checked in a new version with the new Woden results, my stylesheet
updated to support the soap binding extensions and the safety extension.
(doesn't yet do the rpc extension).

 

Naturally, when there was a question I chose my implementation as the
baseline ;-).

 

Woden results appear to me to suffer from several problems:

 

1)       {safety} property is often missing.  I sent an issue on whether
this is a valid interpretation of the spec.

2)       When message content model is #none, Woden emits an invalid
<elementDeclaration ref="id-null"/> reference.

3)       When a binding doesn't specify an interface, Wodwn emits an
invalid <interface ref="id-null"/> reference.

4)       Woden often omits {soap underlying protocol}, though this is a
REQUIRED property in the spec.

5)       Some element declaration components still appear to be missing.

 

 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com
<mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   ][  http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes
<http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes>   ]

 
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2006 19:32:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT