W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

RE: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties

From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:37:20 +1000
Message-ID: <BEE2BD647C052D4FA59B42F5E2D946B317B513@AUSYMS12.ca.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
If that is ALWAYS true - empty = absent - then that's fine, but I thought there were cases where empty != absent?
 
Tony Rogers
CA, Inc
Senior Architect, Development
tony.rogers@ca.com
co-chair UDDI TC at OASIS
co-chair WS-Desc WG at W3C

________________________________

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Thu 25-May-06 3:22
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: interchange issue: empty properties vs. absent properties



The spec equates an empty property and an absent property.  I'm finding a few places in the interchange format where Woden generates an empty property, e.g. <elementDeclarations/>, while I simply omit this element.

 

Seems like the simplest solution would be to canonicalize such that empty properties (which may be all empty elements with no attributes) away - i.e. delete them during canonicalization.  Does that sound reasonable?

 

 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com <mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com>   ][  http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes <http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes>   ]

 
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2006 20:38:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT