W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2

From: John Kaputin (gmail) <jakaputin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 19:41:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4c2ae8f80605241141k610e30f6m10716e2337e9c216@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Did the working group answer this one? If it is unique, an assertion will
need to be added to the spec so Woden validation can capture it.

John Kaputin.

On 5/9/06, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> In the {http headers} property, is the {name} of the HTTP Header
> component, a key? i.e., is each HTTP Header component in {http headers}
> uniquely identified by it's {name}?
>
> This is implied by *6.5.6 IRI Identification Of An HTTP Header component*which uses the {name} in the frag id, so it had better be unique.
>
> Arthur Ryman,
> IBM Software Group, Rational Division
>
> blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
> assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
> mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 18:32:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT