W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2

From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 17:57:39 -0400
To: "John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9F411BD5.256C008F-ON8525717D.00778529-8525717D.0078A94C@ca.ibm.com>
John,

This is CR041 [1]. I hasn't been discussed yet. I expect we'll get to it 
next telecon (June 1).

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR041

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



"John Kaputin (gmail)" <jakaputin@gmail.com> 
05/24/2006 02:41 PM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject
Re: Comment on Part 2, Section 6.5.2






Did the working group answer this one? If it is unique, an assertion will 
need to be added to the spec so Woden validation can capture it.

John Kaputin.

On 5/9/06, Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com> wrote:

In the {http headers} property, is the {name} of the HTTP Header 
component, a key? i.e., is each HTTP Header component in {http headers} 
uniquely identified by it's {name}? 

This is implied by 6.5.6 IRI Identification Of An HTTP Header component 
which uses the {name} in the frag id, so it had better be unique. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 21:57:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT