W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:17:11 -0700
Message-ID: <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39D49F98@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Arthur Ryman" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, <www-ws-desc-request@w3.org>
Great.  Dan has volunteered XFire, but they have not yet started
integrating Woden, so I am not sure if the timeframe will work out.

 

--

Tom Jordahl

Adobe ColdFusion Team

________________________________

From: Arthur Ryman [mailto:ryman@ca.ibm.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 4:38 PM
To: Tom Jordahl
Cc: Lawrence Mandel; www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

 


Tom et al, 

As we are realizing in the implementors calls, simply having a parser
and validator is only part of the implementation. We also need code
generators that create clients and services and that implement the
bindings at runtime correctly. So Woden can be reused by many runtimes
and that would count as different implementations. 

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca 



"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

05/08/2006 02:52 PM 

To

Lawrence Mandel/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <www-ws-desc@w3.org> 

cc

 

Subject

RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

 

 

 




He said he is evaluating it and there would have to be a "very good
reason" for them to write their own. 
  
If Woden is the only Java implementation, that is great.  But it would
be even better to see a few more before we exit CR. :-| 
  
-- 
Tom Jordahl 
Adobe ColdFusion Team 

 

________________________________


From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation? 
  

>I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify
in my note. 

I hope so. Dan has become very active in the Apache WS project. 

Lawrence Mandel

"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

05/08/2006 02:12 PM 

 

To

<www-ws-desc@w3.org> 

cc

  

Subject

Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?


  

 

  

 







FYI - I just noticed that XFire is planning on implementing WSDL 2.0:

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XFIRE/Stack+Comparison


I just sent a note to Dan Diephouse about this to see if we can get him
involved in the implementers group.  I would guess that he is going to
use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note.

--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe 
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 21:17:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT