W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

Re: RDF Mapping status report

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 00:01:11 +0200
To: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Message-Id: <1147125672.10245.30.camel@localhost>

Hi all,

I hereby declare that, from my point of view, and regarding the
functionality (not polishing), the WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping [1]
specification can be presented to the public in a last call for
comments. 8-)

To make it clear - I intend to do more editorial polishing, to enhance
the example, and to do some more coordination with the XMLP WG which may
result in a few localized URI changes. If the WG doesn't like putting
these things off to after LC publication, I'll understand that, but I
think that it will be more time-effective to go for LC now.

Therefore I suggest that we discuss the LC publication on our Thursday
telcon. And oh, the "Status of this document" section in the editor's
draft is out of date, don't pay it any attention. 8-)

Best regards,

Jacek

[1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8

On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 04:48 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I just committed a major update of the RDF mapping document [1]. Sadly,
> it's not quite LC ready yet, let's see where I get tomorrow. 8-)
> 
> Here's what still needs to be done to have an LC draft:
> 
> 1) rename and split some properties according to how they are used
> 2) add QName and HTTP binding mapping tables
> 3) some more minor fixes and editorial polishing
> 
> I aim to suggest LC after these changes, even though there are some more
> small renamings possible (incl. more uncovered coordination with XMLP)
> and as much editorial polishing as will be done (adding convenience
> links, summaries, examples etc.)
> 
> The point is that in the LC draft all functionality as of last CR spec
> drafts will be reflected and any further changes should be minor for any
> possible users.
> 
> More update tomorrow.
> 
> Jacek
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 22:01:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT