W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2006

RE: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

From: Tom Jordahl <tjordahl@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 11:52:23 -0700
Message-ID: <AD0C8E6047016B48A53660CD4888CE39D49EB5@namail4.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Lawrence Mandel" <lmandel@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
He said he is evaluating it and there would have to be a "very good
reason" for them to write their own.

 

If Woden is the only Java implementation, that is great.  But it would
be even better to see a few more before we exit CR. :-|

 

--

Tom Jordahl

Adobe ColdFusion Team

________________________________

From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Mandel
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:43 PM
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

 


>I would guess that he is going to use Woden, but I asked him to clarify
in my note. 

I hope so. Dan has become very active in the Apache WS project. 

Lawrence Mandel




"Tom Jordahl" <tjordahl@adobe.com> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 

05/08/2006 02:12 PM 

To

<www-ws-desc@w3.org> 

cc

 

Subject

Another WSDL 2.0 implementation?

 

 

 






FYI - I just noticed that XFire is planning on implementing WSDL 2.0:

http://docs.codehaus.org/display/XFIRE/Stack+Comparison


I just sent a note to Dan Diephouse about this to see if we can get him
involved in the implementers group.  I would guess that he is going to
use Woden, but I asked him to clarify in my note.

--
Tom Jordahl
Adobe 
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 18:52:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:40 GMT