w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from October to December 2000 by author

Brian LaMacchia

• RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Tuesday, 19 December)
• RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Tuesday, 19 December)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema (Friday, 6 October)

Carl Wallace

• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Tuesday, 3 October)

Christian Geuer-Pollmann

• XML Key Management Services (fwd) (Friday, 1 December)

David M. Balenson

• ANNOUNCE: ISOC Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS'01) (Monday, 11 December)

denis.bider@siol.net

• [announcement] "Efficient Descriptive Data Format" specification and SDK released (Friday, 8 December)

Don Park

• KeyInfo and KeyValue (Thursday, 9 November)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Re: Canonical XML typo? (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting? (Wednesday, 22 November)
• ID for Canonical XML (Monday, 20 November)
• documents versus protocols (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: question on latest spec (Monday, 20 November)
• XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting (NOT) (Monday, 13 November)
• Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting? (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Tuesday, 3 October)

Donald Eastlake 3rd

• XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting? (Thursday, 26 October)

Doug Bunting

• RE: Last Call (Monday, 9 October)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Grammatical issue in Canonical XML CR section 1.1 (Friday, 27 October)

Gerald Huck

• RE: Requirements and Goals for the Design of an 'XML Encryption Standard' (Monday, 20 November)

Gregor Karlinger

• IAIK XML Signature Library (IXSIL) 1.0 Alpha 1 now available (Wednesday, 20 December)
• AW: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Wednesday, 13 December)
• AW: Content of element X509SKI (Friday, 1 December)
• AW: Canonical XML typo? (Friday, 1 December)
• Content of element X509SKI (Thursday, 30 November)
• AW: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 10 November)
• Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Tuesday, 7 November)
• AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 7 November)
• AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 6 November)
• AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 3 November)
• AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 27 October)
• AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Schema question (Tuesday, 17 October)
• AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Monday, 16 October)
• AW: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Saturday, 7 October)
• AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Friday, 6 October)
• AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Thursday, 5 October)

hal@finney.org

• Re: Draft typos and errors (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: Draft typos and errors (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Draft typos and errors (Tuesday, 7 November)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema (Friday, 6 October)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt (Wednesday, 22 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-canonical-00.txt (Tuesday, 21 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-blake-wilson-xmldsig-ecdsa-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-11.txt (Thursday, 2 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-core-10.txt (Wednesday, 18 October)

Jeff Cochran

• RE: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)

John Boyer

• RE: Canonical XML 3.6 (Wednesday, 13 December)
• RE: Canonical XML 3.6 (Wednesday, 13 December)
• RE: Canonical XML typo? (Tuesday, 5 December)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Character Encoding Question (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 17 November)
• RE: question on latest spec (Wednesday, 15 November)
• RE: question on latest spec (Wednesday, 15 November)
• RE: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 10 November)
• RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 7 November)
• RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 6 November)
• RE: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 3 November)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Last Call (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Tuesday, 10 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Friday, 6 October)
• RE: AW: Status of Implementations (Wednesday, 4 October)
• RE: Last Call (Tuesday, 3 October)
• RE: C14N Last Call (Tuesday, 3 October)

Jonathan Marsh

• RE: Canonical XML typo? (Tuesday, 5 December)
• Canonical XML typo? (Thursday, 30 November)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Tuesday, 19 December)
• RE: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Tuesday, 19 December)
• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Monday, 18 December)
• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Friday, 15 December)
• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Thursday, 14 December)
• New Version of Cannonical XML Issues List and Spec (Tuesday, 12 December)
• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Tuesday, 12 December)
• FYI: RE: Character Encoding Question (Tuesday, 12 December)
• Re: Moving Canonical XML along (Tuesday, 12 December)
• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Tuesday, 12 December)
• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Tuesday, 12 December)
• Re: ECDSA in XML (Friday, 8 December)
• Moving Canonical XML along (Friday, 8 December)
• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Thursday, 7 December)
• Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI (Friday, 1 December)
• Closing on Whitespace and Examples 3.4 and 3.7 (Wednesday, 22 November)
• Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031 (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: PKIXML (Monday, 20 November)
• Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft (Monday, 20 November)
• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Thursday, 16 November)
• RE: question on latest spec (Thursday, 16 November)
• Re: Question about your c14n implementations (Tuesday, 14 November)
• FYI: Update of Participants (Monday, 13 November)
• Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 9 November)
• Re: Draft typos and errors (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: DSIG spec question, section 2.3 (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: Draft typos and errors (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Tuesday, 7 November)
• Re: file corrupted (Monday, 6 November)
• Fwd: Call for Implementation: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting? (Thursday, 26 October)
• Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: PKCS (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: Close of XML Signature Last Call (Monday, 23 October)
• Close of XML Signature Last Call (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: XML Digital SIgnature (Friday, 20 October)
• FYI: A P3P Assurance Signature Profile (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: AW: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Thursday, 19 October)
• FYI: XPath Errata (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: AW: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: RetrievalMethod issues (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: X509Data example minor issue (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Minor XMLDSIG edits (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Old Schema to New Schema XSLT? (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: LC-104 and LC-105 XML Signature WG's review of XML Schema (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Thursday, 5 October)
• RE: XMLDigSig WD-2000-09-18 (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Monday, 2 October)
• Re: PKCS1 in XML DSIG (Monday, 2 October)
• RE: XSL Transform (Monday, 2 October)
• Brief Report on EESSI Meeting (Monday, 2 October)

Juan Carlos Cruellas

• Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Friday, 24 November)
• Countersignature capabilities in the current draft (Wednesday, 15 November)

Juergen Brauckmann

• wrong ATTLIST for RetrievalMethod in core-09 (Friday, 6 October)

Karl Scheibelhofer

• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Monday, 11 December)
• RE: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....] (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Tuesday, 28 November)
• RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Monday, 27 November)
• Representation of OIDs as URIs (Friday, 24 November)

Ken Goldman

• Re: DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI (Wednesday, 8 November)
• DSIG spec question, section 2.3 (Monday, 6 November)
• DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI (Monday, 6 November)

Kevin Regan

• RE: question on latest spec (Wednesday, 15 November)
• RE: question on latest spec (Wednesday, 15 November)
• RE: question on latest spec (Wednesday, 15 November)
• question on latest spec (Monday, 13 November)

Lorrie Cranor

• Re: A P3P Assurance Signature Profile (Wednesday, 8 November)

Martin J. Duerst

• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• Fwd: I18N problem in XML canonicalisation (Saturday, 25 November)
• Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Friday, 24 November)

merlin

• Re: Moving Canonical XML along (Saturday, 9 December)
• Re: AW: Content of element X509SKI (Friday, 1 December)
• Re: Content of element X509SKI (Thursday, 30 November)
• Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 17 November)
• Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft (Thursday, 16 November)
• Re: DSIG Spec 4.3.3.1 - missing URI (Wednesday, 15 November)
• Re: Requesting Canonical XML Candidate Rec shortly (Saturday, 14 October)
• Re: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Saturday, 14 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: RetrievalMethod issues (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Minor XMLDSIG edits (Monday, 9 October)
• X509Data example minor issue (Sunday, 8 October)
• RetrievalMethod issues (Sunday, 8 October)
• Re: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Saturday, 7 October)
• Re: AW: AW: AW: Status of Implementations (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: C14N Last Call (Tuesday, 3 October)

Michael Mealling

• [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....] (Monday, 27 November)
• OIDs as URI/URNs.... (Monday, 27 November)

Mikulin, Lana

• XML-Signature Interoperability (Thursday, 19 October)

mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp

• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Friday, 15 December)

muraw3c@attglobal.net

• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Saturday, 16 December)
• Re: Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Wednesday, 13 December)
• Comments on "XML-Signature Syntax and Processing" (Monday, 11 December)

Olivier DUBUISSON

• Re: Summary of OID and URI discussion and steps forward (Wednesday, 29 November)
• Re: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....] (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Friday, 24 November)
• Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Friday, 24 November)

OmPlace

• Contra Dance Info (Sunday, 22 October)

Paul Hoffman / IMC

• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Thursday, 30 November)
• RE: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)

Peter Lipp

• AW: PKIXML (Monday, 20 November)
• PKIXML (Monday, 20 November)
• AW: Brief Report on EESSI Meeting (Tuesday, 3 October)

Petteri Stenius

• RE: Signature Last Call Ends October 20th (and update to spec) (Monday, 16 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: Tentative signature over C14N examples (Wednesday, 11 October)

Philip Hallam-Baker

• RE: [leslie@thinkingcat.com: Re: OIDs as URI/URNs....] (Wednesday, 29 November)

Rasmussen Jesper Broe

• What is signed with the hash of SignatureMethod ? (Wednesday, 15 November)

Rick Jelliffe

• RE: Canonical XML 3.6 (Friday, 15 December)
• RE: Canonical XML 3.6 (Wednesday, 13 December)
• Canonical XML 3.6 (Wednesday, 13 December)

rida

• file corrupted (Thursday, 2 November)

Romanosky, Sasha

• [w3c-ietf-xmldsig] <none> (Thursday, 7 December)

rsalz@CaveoSystems.com

• Re: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Saturday, 25 November)

Simon Blake-Wilson

• Re: ECDSA in XML (Monday, 27 November)
• ECDSA in XML (Friday, 17 November)

Stern, David L

• Second last Call - Re: WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Thursday, 19 October)

Susan Lesch

• Re: minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031 (Tuesday, 21 November)
• minor typos in CR-xmldsig-core-20001031 (Sunday, 12 November)
• minor typos in CR-xml-c14n-20001026 (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Thursday, 19 October)
• minor comments for WD-xmldsig-core-20001012 (Wednesday, 18 October)

TAMURA Kent

• Re: AW: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 17 November)
• Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: Call for Implementation: Canonical XML Becomes a W3C Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Friday, 6 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: Comments on XML-Signature S&P draft (Tuesday, 3 October)

tesi.simone@serenacom.net

• DOM & Canonicalization (Tuesday, 21 November)

tgindin@us.ibm.com

• Re: X509Data example minor issue (Tuesday, 10 October)
• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Thursday, 5 October)
• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Tuesday, 3 October)
• Re: Very minor comment in the spec. (Tuesday, 3 October)

The IESG

• Protocol Action: XML-Signature Syntax and Processing to Proposed Standard (Friday, 24 November)

Tom Gindin

• RE: Anonymous types in the DSig Schema (Tuesday, 12 December)
• Re: ECDSA in XML (Saturday, 9 December)
• Re: Character Encoding Question (Wednesday, 29 November)
• RE: Representation of OIDs as URIs (Monday, 27 November)
• Re: ECDSA in XML (Friday, 17 November)

Tom Gindin/Watson/IBM

• Re: Countersignature capabilities in the current draft (Wednesday, 15 November)

Walter Houser

• Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting? (Wednesday, 22 November)

Yongge Wang

• Re: ECDSA in XML (Saturday, 9 December)
• Re: ECDSA in XML (Friday, 8 December)

Yoshiaki KAWATSURA

• Very minor comment in the spec. (Tuesday, 3 October)

Last message date: Wednesday, 20 December 2000 05:36:28 UTC