W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Moving Canonical XML along

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:14:00 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Cc: Petteri Stenius <Petteri.Stenius@done360.com>, merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>

The Call for Implementaion Period for Canonical XML closed on November 24th. 
An InformationalRFC as well as a new Candidate Rec (for consideration for 
Proposed Rec) is being prepared. Changes made include those resulting from 
comments [1,2,3], no change was made with respect to [4].

However, in order to successfully advance it to Proposed Rec, it'd be good 
in we could fill in some of the gaps in the interop-report [5]. (Petteri and 
Merlin, can you report on the list the status of your implementations with 
respect to these questions about the parsers treatment of encoding and 
relative URIs?)

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0094.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0196.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0208.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0163.html
[5] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html

Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 15:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:35 UTC