The Call for Implementaion Period for Canonical XML closed on November 24th. An InformationalRFC as well as a new Candidate Rec (for consideration for Proposed Rec) is being prepared. Changes made include those resulting from comments [1,2,3], no change was made with respect to [4]. However, in order to successfully advance it to Proposed Rec, it'd be good in we could fill in some of the gaps in the interop-report [5]. (Petteri and Merlin, can you report on the list the status of your implementations with respect to these questions about the parsers treatment of encoding and relative URIs?) [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0094.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0196.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0208.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0163.html [5] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 15:14:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT