Moving Canonical XML along

The Call for Implementaion Period for Canonical XML closed on November 24th. 
An InformationalRFC as well as a new Candidate Rec (for consideration for 
Proposed Rec) is being prepared. Changes made include those resulting from 
comments [1,2,3], no change was made with respect to [4].

However, in order to successfully advance it to Proposed Rec, it'd be good 
in we could fill in some of the gaps in the interop-report [5]. (Petteri and 
Merlin, can you report on the list the status of your implementations with 
respect to these questions about the parsers treatment of encoding and 
relative URIs?)

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0094.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0196.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0208.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2000OctDec/0163.html
[5] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html

__
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 15:14:27 UTC