- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 15:54:57 -0500
- To: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
- Cc: "John Boyer" <jboyer@PureEdge.com>, merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
The reason I asked was that because in the conformance table [1], I had nodest input with SHOULD and subsetting with MUST which was sort of confusing: >Implementations MUST support the octet stream input and SHOULD also support >the document subset feature via node-set input. >http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-xml-c14n-20001026#DataModel With this understanding I'll show subsetting as a mandatory feature, and node-set input as a optional way of implementing and mark Baltimore with a Y for both. [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html r/jboyer@PureEdge.com/2000.10.26/10:18:50 >... > >One of the final editorial tweaks that Joseph asked me to make was to amend > >the beginning of section 2.1 to make it clear that document subsetting and > >node-set input meant the same thing. When I say node-set input is > >recommended (as opposed to required), I'm saying that a conformant > >implementation should but is not required to do document subsetting as > >described in Section 2.4 and exemplified in Section 3.7. > > > >Since both of you have working code for example 3.7, I am just writing to > >ask whether this does indeed mean you created your implementation using > >XPath node-sets. __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2000 15:56:35 UTC