Re: X509Data example minor issue

     The order you give is the correct LDAP order.  The order currently in
the document matches the actual DN in ASN.1 and also the OSF syntax.  Since
we're using LDAP delimiters, we should probably use LDAP order.

          Tom Gindin

merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>@w3.org on 10/08/2000 02:45:24 PM

Sent by:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org


To:   w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
cc:
Subject:  X509Data example minor issue




Hi,

4.4.4 The X509Data Element:

The commented distinguished names in the example are
backwards; in text form they should go from CN to C,
as the non-commented distinguished name does. Also
the intermediate cert says "... issuer ,C=..." which
might be better expressed as "...;<br>issuer C=..."
or somesuch.

merlin

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 15:01:18 UTC